Once upon a time, book banning (and book burning!) involved books that were considered too dangerous for children or adults. But these days, books that are banned tend to be those written for young adult and child readers—not for adults.
What makes discussions of banned books interesting is that the dialogue is, essentially, a conversation about what we’re most afraid of—and what older generations fear for younger generations.
An article from TIME Magazine compares the types of books that were being routinely banned in 2001 vs. the types of books being banned fourteen years later. In 2001, books were banned for language and religion. Nowadays, they’re more likely to be banned for cultural and sexual issues.
Elements That Some Book Readers Deem Offensive—And May Get Your Book Banned
LGTBQ characters (especially young adults or kids). Books like I Am Jazz (geared toward elementary age children) that feature transgender main characters tend to spark conversation—and argument. Also, young adult novels that feature same-sex romances (explicitly or not) will make the “do not read” list among certain groups of parents and adults.
Drugs. Some adults don’t like to see depictions of kids doing drugs under any circumstances. Case in point: the frequent banning of This One Summer by Mariko Tamaki and illustrated by Jillian Tamaki. That said, books that work as morality tales against drug use (the users fail, the abstainers win) might be deemed more acceptable by book banners.
Expletives. Rainbow Rowell’s Eleanor & Park features a few curse words—and for that reason, some schools and parent organizations have suggested steering young readers away from this story. Their argument uses the rationale behind movie rating guidelines: If a Disney princess dropped the F-bomb, would the movie be fit for children? Your call.
Racist language. Racial slurs catch the eyes (and wrath) of many groups. Sure, a writer might argue that the language is an authentic representation of the way some people speak in real life. But there are readers who prefer aspirational language, or language that hints at racial issues, instead of language verisimilitude. In fact, To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee was banned in one state as recently as last year because of the racist slurs used in the story.
Explicit sexual situations (and even some non-explicit ones). If there’s one major element that could get your book banned, it’s narrative depictions of sex. Book after book is banned for descriptions of sexual encounters of various kinds. There are so many books banned for sexual content, we can’t list them all here. Take a look at any list of banned books, and you’ll find somebody complaining about graphic sex.
Books written by potential criminals. Bill Cosby’s children’s book series has been banned outright or simply not included in the circulation at some schools and libraries.
Content not appropriate for the target age group. This category runs the gamut from philosophical discussion to political viewpoints to general themes and concerns. Essentially, book banners argue that certain books marketed toward a specific demographic are not appropriate for that age group.
What About Violence? Surprisingly, books geared toward children that are somewhat violent rarely appear on lists of banned books.
Question: Do you think that books containing content inappropriate for a certain age group should be banned from public circulation at schools and libraries?
To whom it may concern,
I have heard about books being banned because of “offensive language” and “sexually explicit content”. Although banning books that fall under these classifications provide some benefits, the downsides could potentially render the benefits invalid. Banned books are important, as they provide a new perspective on a particular topic, whether that topic is a political stance, social issue, or ethical complication. Instead of banning these books, I would like to provide a suggestion for what should be done instead of banning these books.
I suggest that labels should be printed on the back of the books stating why those books would normally be banned (i.e., “Contains sexual content”, “Contains offensive language”, etc.) and that these books be placed on their own shelves in their own library section. After they are placed on the shelves, simply organize the books the same way other non-banned books are organized. Placing notices stating that those particular shelves hold books that would normally be banned would help notify consumers about the potentially offensive content contained in the books.
Regardless of how offensive the content might be, any book that provides a new perspective on a topic deserves to be published. If a book can spark controversy and discussion among readers, regardless of the readers’ ages, then it deserves to be published. If a book provides a potential explanation for the author’s actions, then the book deserves to be published. If a book is about a topic that deviates from the social, political, or ethical norms that exist our modern society, then it deserves to be published. Just because a book is realistic or different from the norm cannot justify depriving the world of new knowledge.